As I was walking to my office, a student flagged me down and asked how to solve a problem similar to this, . He could not understand the steps as written in his student’s solution manual.

I blurted out, “That’s disgusting!” He agreed though probably not for the same reason and then I showed him what was going on. The problem as written is notationally disgusting. It mixes fractional exponent notation and root notation. This is dead wrong. Either write or . Solve the first equation by multiplying each term by and the second equation by multiplying each term by . The solution manual multiplied the original equation by expecting the student to know that is . In the student’s problem the answer satisfied the implicit domain restriction, here . Notice that for our problem the “solution” is outside of this domain and the problem has no real number solution. (Give this problem to *Wolfram|Alpha* and it gives .

We need to make up our mind. Use root notation or rational exponent notation, certainly not both in the same expression. I am in favor of using rational exponent exclusively and teaching that for must be non-negative when dealing with real numbers. If we do this, many of the special rules for working with radicals will go away. Root notation is archaic. Let’s teach it as an historical artifact only and save our students time, trouble, and tedium.